Search This Blog

Wednesday 23 March 2016

Comparison between an epic poem‘The Waste Land’ by T. S. Eliot and a Gujarati novel “Manavini Bhavai” by Pannalal Patel.

Abstract:-
This article tries to compare texts fromtwodistinct literatures.The Waste Land by Eliot from British background and Manavini Bhavai by Pannalal Patel from Indian (Gujarati) background. Both the texts are located in first half of 20th century. This article is an attempt to read contemporary society with the help of both the texts. How there wasdehumanization, sexual perversion, spiritual draught were wide spread in society. Culture was being totally rotten.
Key Words: spiritual draught/degradation, sexual perversion, dehumanization, World War, Draught, rottenness of culture.

Comparison betweenanepicpoem‘The Waste Land’ by T. S. Eliot and aGujarati novel  “Manavini Bhavai” by Pannalal Patel.
Introduction
‘The Waste Land’ is written by T. S. Eliot in early 20th century. The title of this long epic poem itself suggests the essence of this poem that what is all about.
            ‘The Waste Land’ means barren land where nothing grows- a desert, or any barren or uninteresting place. Eliot is very self/auto critical. So he criticizes his own nation (country) or say entire Europe by calling it Wasteland & people living in it as Wastelanders. He criticizes Sexual perversion, spiritual degradation and dehumanization of Western society. He is showing mirror to the world who they are, Rather than praising his culture he attacks the rottenness of his culture.One of itsmajor themes is the barrenness of a post-warworld in which human sexuality has beenperverted from its normal course and thenatural world too has become infertile.
Northrop Fryesays in his essay “Archetypal criticism” that “some where we all (entire human race) (East or West) are connected.”Basic human nature is common everywhere. We share common Psyche. Then the question came to my mind is that where is this kind of rottenness in our culture? AreweresemblingcharacteristicsofwastelandersorHollowmaninEliot'ssense??Whatarethepitfallsandshortcomingsofourculture?
And if it istherethen how it is mirrored in our (regional) literature. So I think “Manavini Bhavai”- a Gujarati novel by Pannalal Patel is suitable option to compare with “The Waste Land”.

★Titularsignificance:-
Significance of the title:-
Title suggests the essence of the work. Both the writers have carefully choosen the title of their work.
Through reading of literature ultimately we come to know about the self. if literature is mirror orX-Rayimageofselforsociety, then reading literature is the quest for the self. We have to identify where we are/ ami in literature?
Eliot's title of the poem is very significant, suggestive & appropriate because it signifies three Wasteland- that of Fisher King, Oedipus and Biblical or Modern Europe.
Where as Pannalal Patel clarifies the meaning of the title in the preface of the novel. Because the Gujarati word 'Bhavai' has various contextual meanings.
Bhavai is in traditional Gujarati folk culture isa kind of play/ drama performance by all male members of vivid historical events & figures- especially during Navaratri festival.
So the title has connotation that 'Manavini' means people's/ Human being's,  &'Bhavai' means drama. It connotes that human being's entire life is like a drama & we are just like puppet. We have to play our roles and exit the stage. Nothing is in one's hand. Inspite of knowing we can't do anything. It signifies the futility of human's life.
But Pannalal Patel says in the preface of the novel though the word 'Bhavai' has its literal meaning, another meaning of word 'Bhavai' is  'MILKAT'means property (something that is owned)
-belongings
-important types of property include real property(land), personal property(other physical profession), & intellectal property etc.

So we can roughly translate the title of the novel as "people's property".
Which is the property of human bengs??
- a piece of land? gold etc jewellery ? animals? money? or good relations with other??
The novel is serious debate over this question. As the novel progresses because of severeDraught slowly and steadily people looses their everything. After loosing all the material things, even human relations are under danger. People are killing other, looting others only to get food/tosatisfytheirhunger.
Such dehumanization & downfall of people is unimaginable. So the tone of the title of the novel is bitter & ironic.

★Setting:-
The setting of both of this text is common. Dehumanizing effect of First World War (1914-1918) is clearly seen in the Waste Land, whereasChappaniyo Dushkal(Draught of 1900) plays a vital role in this novel.
★The Waste Land
Aprilisthecruellestmonth....
InTheWasteLandAprilisnotthehappymonthofpilgrimagesandstorytelling,butinthemodernworldwinteristhetimeofforgetfulnessandnumbness.Marie'schildhoodrecollectionsarealsopainful.Thesimpleworldofcousinsandcoffeeintheparkhasbeenreplacedbyacomplexsetofemotionalandpoliticalconsequencesresultingfromthewar.Thisshowshowbadlythingshavedecayed.Eliotdescribes the boredom, emptiness and pessimism of modern age in bitter, ironical and satirical verse.

Unreal City,
Under the brown fog of a winter dawn,
A crowd flowed over London Bridge, so many,
I had not thought death had undone so many.
Sighs, short and infrequent, were exhaled,
And each man fixed his eyes before his feet.
-(Part-1-Burial of the Dead)
Through this T. S. Eliot shows the realistic picture of mechanical life of the people living in London of that era. Thisfinalepisodeofthefirstsectionisthemostsurreal.ThespeakerwalksthroughaLondonpopulatedbyghostsofthedead.People are lifeless, feeling/ emotionless, dull and mechanical. Running like machine according to clock. The same scene is created in the beginning of the movie “Modern Times” by Charley Chaplin. These lines are very suggestive- that Death has undone so many means even if they were living are lookinglike dead. And each man walking fixed his eye before his feet- means following/ obeying others blindly without rational thinking just like sheep. In short he criticizes MECHANICAL LIFE of Modern Man.
In the novel “Manavini Bhavai” Pannalal Patel also portrays the realistic rural picture of people living in Gujarat. (Though Gujarat became separate state in 1st may 1960, and novel is written much earlier. I mean people living in that region)  Kalu is the protagonist, hero of the novel& Raju is heroine. At large extent this novel is abouttheir love. But as I. A. Richards has said(in New criticism )isclose reading of text.( Wikipedia)and“to read between the lines”.MeansTo study the society we also have to read what is not written.
Novel tells about the time that- there was poverty in society. In entire novel there is not even name of education. Except farming /agriculturepeopledon’t have other work. People were addicted of intoxication. Individual was not free to do what he wants to do, he was bounded by so many social chains. Marriages were decided at the age of 1 or 3 years or many times even before the birth of children. (Issue of child marriage)  And because of such rules individual has to suffer a lot- marriages became monotonous, cause of destruction, ruin of the lives of the people.
The same thing happens in this novel also, that from childhood marriage of Kalu and Raju was decided but because of adverse circumstances both gets married to different partner. Both still continues to love each other by heart, but because of society they can’t make it public.
Kalu is not happy in his married life, same with Raju also but then even they go on stretching the relations. Kalu clearly says to his wife that though we are united by body, we cannot be united by soul.
  JF,F 0M;FGL lJNFI YTF H V[ ;U56 TM0FJ[ K[PGFG56DF ;FY[ ZD[,F\4WM,SFvWM,SL HD[,F4;FTTF/L NFJDF\ ;FY[ B[,[,F4B[TZG[ ;LDF0[ C;[,F VF A\G[ H6G[ K]8Z 5F0[ K[v G[ 5NTFGF 3ZDF\ VFJ[ K[ E,LG[ SFD[ ‘cc-LDR]\ccP
                                       VW]]ZFDF\ 5]Z] SF/] GL DF DZTL JBT[ V[GL 5F;[YL K[<,] J[6 DF\UL ,[ K[ S[ccALH] A{~ GlC SZ]cc SF/] HF6[ X]/L 5Z ;}TM K[P GYL pTZFT] S[ GYL V\TSF/ VFJTMP

(Means after death of kalu’s father their engagement is broken. Childhood friends thus departs and Kalu marries to a girl, whomhe don’t like. And his mother has taken promise from him that he will not marry twice or he will not bring second wife. He is like sleeping on the edge of thorns- neither hecanlive nor die.)

In The Waste Land we find Mechanical people, then in this novel Manavini Bhavai  we find the mechanical relationship- lifeless, feeling less and dull.What is the use of relations where individual is not happy. 
2
                                                                                                                                                           
Other major theme of The Waste Land is Sexual Perversion and Spiritual degradation of Western society. As Eliot is Modernist writer he does not say this clearly, but uses various myths /allusions/referencesfrom different cultures to tell his point. Myth of Hycinth girl, myth of Apollo, myth of Tristan and Isolde, myth of   Philomela and Procne indirectly presents the sexual perversion of Western society.Thereissymbolicuseofmythstoconnectthepresentwiththepast.

The change of Philomel, by the barbarous king
So rudely forced; yet there the nightingale
Filled all the desert with inviolable voice
And still she cried………….
(2- A Game of Chess)
……………, and think of poor Albert,
He’s been in the army four years; he wants a good time,
If you don’t give it him, there’s others will, I said.
(2- A Game of Chess)
Instead of a life-giving act of love, sex occursin the poem as seduction or rape, leading toabortion-whichcanbesymbolicallyinterpretedfromabovelines.
TherelationbetweenTypistandClearkalsosignifiestheirlustratherthanpurelove.
Theme of “The Waste Land” is spiritual degradation and sexual perversion. So same thing is also therein the novel “Manavini Bhavai”. For example in the novel there is an incident that when Raju was working in the farm at that timeamanfromvillage,whohaddesireforRaju comes and tries to misbehave with her. He wanted to take disadvantage of her being alone.BecauserumourswerespreadinthevillagethatRaju'shusbandisillandimpotent,sosheissexuallyunsatisfiedwithherhusband.
            This shows the sexual perversion of our culture also. Generally peoplethink that this kind of things happen only in Western Countries.







There is also another incident in the novel, Manavini Bhavai which attacks on our so called ‘saints’, or ‘sadhu’, or ‘religious leaders’.
In Manavini Bhavai, there is a chapter “ Bavani Langoti”, which is a story within a story & through comedy, rather in a humorous way writer criticizes such people.
In the novel Kalu’s father Vala Patel tells stories to the other…
Once there was a “Bavo”- (a priest) of the temple of Lord Shiva. He was living by begging from village.& at the progress & end of the story he develops illegitimate sexual relation with a widow. When he came to know that this woman is going to give birth to a child- he runs away.

Now the point is that is he really spiritual (Pious) person??

Indian spirituality, since thousandsofyearsis famous in the world. Saints are the person who have achieved a state of mind- from which nothing else remains to achieve. They are above human emotions like happiness, unhappiness, misery, greed,suffering etc. saints have shown path to the world- how to live life.
This reference from the novel shows us that how there is also spiritual degradation in our society.

T[YLI A[C] K]\ K[<,F 5SZ6 c pH0 VFE,[ VDLc DF SF/]GL TZ; DFG;LS TZ; lK5FJJF ZFH] V[GF DMDF\ VG] :TG VF5[ K[PT[ HFlTI J'lT 36L HUTDF\ K[P56 SF/] H[JF TG[ G[ DG[ T\N]Z:T T[DF\ G ;50FI V[ :JEFlJS K[P
v NX"S


(Last chapter is also suggestive to present the mental thirst of Kalu. The novel ends when Raju- heroine of the novel gave her breast in Kalu’s mouth to satisfy his thirst. Symbolically we can also read as Kalu’s sexual desire for Raju.)

♣Impotency:-
Eliot picks up on the figure of the Fisher King legend's Wasteland as an appropriate description of the state of modern society.

AsmentionedinthebiginningofthearticlethatTitleconnotesthreewasteLand,oneofthemisofFisherKing'sWasteLand.Fisher Kingisthe impotent  ruler of the waste land, and the prevailing spirit of The Waste Land.
AndinWasteLandword"Nothingness"comesagainandagain,symbolisesasexualfailure,amomentofimpotence.Thereisnotasinglemomentofjoy.Sothereisneitherreconciliationnoractionispossible.
similalyin"ManviniBhavai"Impotencyrevolvesaroundthelivesofthecentralcharacter.HeroineRaju'shusband'Dyalji'wassufferingfromillnessandimpotentency.Evenaftersomanyyearsoftheirmarriagetheyhadnochild.AndinthenoveltownfolkmakesgossipaboutRaju'sbeautyandherhusband'simpotency.Husband'sconstantillnessandimpotencyaswellasseveredraughtbringscatastropheinRaju'slife.Butaboveallimpotencysnatchesawayallthejoysandgloriesofpastfromher.Howpowerful,attractiveandconfidentgirlshewasinpast!!!Andnowtotallytransformedgirl!!
So,inboththetextImpotencyissomethingthatisdeeplysymbolicallyconnected.
3


DCFZFHGF WFGGL Z1FFG[ A\NMA:T AD8[ VFJ[,F ,xSZL 8M/FJF/L A\N]SM HM.G[ V[ RL; GFBL p9[ K[P cc VZ[ UMhFZF E}lZIF ! DFZJFDF\ TFZL K+LS/F JF5ZL tIFZ[ V[ SZTF SFSF lHFJ0JFG]\ BM/L SF-I] CMT TM HF6TF S[ GF K+L S/FGM T]\ BZM lGS?IMP
(Because of draught, people don’t have food to eat. At that time there is incident in the novel that an Englishman was passing from village with grains of king. People of village tries to rob him. An Englishman tries to threaten by Gun, at that time Kalu speaks very beautiful line that ‘AreBhuriya’ (Oh!Whiteman) you have invented gun to kill the people, but if you have shown this skill to save/ protect people than it would be better.) This is the bitter criticism on modern man and its technological advancement.
   V[S V6]AMdA ;F0F K VAH 0M,ZGM AG[ K[PV[S lJDFG SFO,M V[S GFGF ZFQ8=GL GLXF/ H[8,M BR" DF\U[ K[PAF/SMG[ N}W GYL 5CMrI]\ 4ZMULVMG[ NJF GYL 5CM\RL 4lGZFzLTMG[ VFzI GYL 5CM\rIM4E}bIFVMG[ 5MQF6 GYL V5FI]456 AMdA 4h[ZL U[;4 G[ GF{SFSFO,M JWTM HFI K[PV[DF VWL" 5F.GLV[ BFDLI N[BFTL GYLPDFGJLGL A]lwWV[vS,FV[ HF6[ lJGFXGF ;WGMG[ tIF ;[JF VF5L K[PGlCTZ X]\ JZ;FNG[ AF\WL 8L5[8L5FG[ ;FRJL N]QSF/G[ CO\OFJM T[ D]xS[, K[P?-Darshak – Manubhai Pancholi
‘Darshak’ writes in the preface of Manavini Bhavai that cost of one atom bomb is billions of rupees. Rather than school more money is spent on Army. We have failed in providing milk to children, medicines to patients, home to homeless people and food to people. But military is increasing day by day. If all this is possible than why it is not possible to save people from draught?)
4

Dehumanization of Society

The effect First World War is clearly seen in the poem The Waste Land. Because of war there is ruin, destruction in society.
Because of war, people became blood thirsty. Poverty, mass- killing, immorality, chaos in society was there. As soldiers have to live away from their family, so women had developed extra marital relations with other men. And because of this newer problems came into being- illegitimate children, workhouse, child laboring etc.
            The role that First World War played in Europe same role was played by Draught


  :FF{V[v;F{DF DF6;DF\4EUJFGDF\4S]NZTDF\ ;DFHvjIJ:YFDF\ VF:YF U]DFJL K[PtIFZ[ 56 SF/] ;FDFgI DFGJLGL ;FZF DF6;F.DF\YL  zwWF BMTM GYLPV[ SC[ K[ vccE}B E}0L K[4DFGJL E}\0]\ GYLPcc
It was a time when all the people have lost theirfaith from human beings as well as from god also. But Kalu like T. S. Eliot himself keeps faith in humanity. He says people are not bad but hunger makes them so.
JF{XFBGF J\8M/F J/L X~ YIF 56 VF JZ;[ G DF/FVMGF 3F; p0IFv CMI TM p0[G[? S[ G TM p0TF T6B,F 4;}SF\ 5F\N0FI V[8,[ S[ T[ ;}SF YTF 5C[,F H ,MSM BF. UIF CX[!
cc p0TL CTL ,}\ G[ ALHL WZTLGL W}/ S[ SF.S p0TF CTF DFGJLVMGF DFYFGF ;]UZF JF/cc
The draught was so terrible that there was not even dry grass in nest. People have eaten even leaves of trees!!!!



                                  WZTL 5Z DMTGM JZ;FN JZ;L ZCIPJGDF\  4B[TZDF\ AHFZDF\ VG[ X[ZLVMDF\ \HIF\ H]VM tIF\ D0NF H D0NFP ccSIF AF/JF G[ SIF NF8JFcc5KL SF64;]TS VG[ ;ZFJJFGL TM JFT H SIF ZCL?5FK/ ZC[,F TM ;\AWLVMG[ VFU. SIF" GL ZFCT VG]EJTF CTF4B]X YTF CTFPccU6TF ZCIF PPPPG N[BJFv G NFhJFPcc



The scene looks as if there is rain of corpse, dead bodies. In farm, street everywhere corpses were lying here and there. No one was thinking about even burying them, but rather people were happy.

DF,L 0M;L 5M8,F ;MTL H ,}8FI K[ G[ 8F8LIF 3;0L DZ[ K[P

The picture of society was worst that, robbers have looted the ornaments of Mali Doshi –anoldman- a villainous character in the novel. Not only that but they even robbed a woman’s clothes- killed her and left her naked. What can we say this except dehumanization of human!!??Andmorethanthatherson'Naniyo'wascrying,notbecausehermotherwasdeadbutbecauseherallthejewellerywerelooted.Thereisfuneralprocessioninwhichsonhastoputapieceofgoldinthemouthofdeadone(mother)(Mali),buthersondeniestodothat.Forhimandhiswifeapieceofgoldismorepreciousthandeadmotherlyingonfuneralpyre.


Asareferenceletstake one more example from “ Saurashtrani Rasadhar”abook by Jhaverchand Meghani(very well known Gujarati writer)toconnectwiththistext&toreadthecontemporarysociety.he also portrays the picture of contemporarysociety. In oneofhisstorytitled “ Jato Halkaro”  we come to know what kind of people we were just before 100 or so years, not so far. though Meghani has described it in Veer Rasa, but we can read society. In  the story  husband and wife were passing  ( by walking)nearly at evening and they were looted. ( it means that there were not good medium of transportation. Oursociety was not developed) (Peopleusedtotravelbybullockcart,andthosewhowererichtheyhadhorses)Jato Halakaro-apostmanfromnearbyvillage tries to save them and dies. But my point is that how can we say that our past was glorious , if people passing by  just at evening were not safe. Only for few jewelry and money people were robbed and killed. This is the reality. In Gujarati culture there are so many famousstories about the ‘Baharvatiya’  ( robber) who were looting entire village. If this is the reality then how can we be proud of our rotten culture? This aspect leads us to another question that why someone do robbery? It means that there was poverty in society. People were ready to kill each other for few money. Education was not there. Even with her husband woman were looted then what if she beingalone?

ccEL,M -MZ RMZL HFI K[PWF0 5F0JF VFJ[ K[PvSF/] E]bIF H[JF EL,0FGF 8M/F HM.4E]bIF KMSZF G[ J,J,F8 SZTF DM8FVMGF 5UDF\ VF/M8TF HM.G[4SF/] X]\ SFD lGS?IM CTM V[ E],L H. DGDF\ G[ DGFD SC[ K[occ VF ,MSM SIFZ[ DFZL Z[X[ VG[ SIFZ[ BFJF E[UF YFX[? G[ lARFZ] -MZ SIFZ[ K]8X[?

Pannalal Patel shows the harsh reality of that time- that people were looted even in daylight.  Not only money and jewelry   but animals were also not safe. Once there is an incident in the novel that  “Bhil”- tribal people attacks the village and drive away people’s domestic animals like cows and buffaloes etc. so Kalu- the protagonist with few friends follows them to protect animal. But there he saw a terrible scene, which one can never forget….. That there were many groups of people, looking exactly like skeleton ( because they had no food to eat, so they werelike living dead) are eating a living/alivebuffalo. Someone is drinking blood, others are eating other body parts like leg etc. they had no weapon to kill or cut, for them their teeth was everything.!!!!

Another scene which he saw was that people were hitting stones to animal to kill & eat.
  VG[ R-TFGL ;FY[ H[ NxI HMI] V[ TM SF/] V[GF VJTFZDF\ v VZ[ ;FT VJTFZ[I GlC E},L XS[!JL;v5rRL; CF0l5H\Z 45[,F DZ[,F -MZ 5Z T]8L 50TF CTF4NFT H KZLVM CTL G[ N[JTF TM 5[8DF\ E0E0TM H CTM G[? SF/] S\5L p9IMP1F6EZ TM V[G[ JC[D 50IM S[ 5KL ULW0F K[P?
ULWGL H[D H Y. ZCI] CT]PSM. 5[,F KMSZFG[ C0;[,F DFZT] CT]\ TM SM. 0MXL B}G 5LTL CTLP
-MZGF V[S[S 5U[ A[A[ H6 AR0F EZTF CTF4HIFZ[ T,FJZM ;FY[ R0L A[9[,F A[ H6M TM SF5LvSF5LG[ v,\UM8L p5ZF\T S50] CMI TM BM/MI J/[G[!AU,DF\ DFZTF\ TM J/L 5[8G[ ;FY. JrR[ NAFJTF CTF.T,JFZGM 0Z CTM TMI SM. V[SFN ,MRM TF6L ,[T] CT]\P
VF AWFGF 5UDF\ VFJTF KMSZF o cBFJ]\ VF.! BFJ]\ PPPP SF/] HF6TM CTM S[ V[DGF CFY5UDF\ V[S T6B,]\ TM0JF H[8,LI XlST GYLP KTFI V[S 5F0LGF U/F5Z BF0]\ hLSL 5F0I]\ PPPP VG[ V[ 50[,F -MZ 5Z HF6[ UM/GF -[OF 5Z DSM0F OZL J?IF P5[,F ,MSM ARSF EZLG[ ,MCL 5L G[ HFOT p0FJTF CTFP
V[S 8M/FV[ KZLYL SFD ,LW]\ TM ALHL 8M/LV[ S]CF0LGM p5IMU SIM"PTM ClYIFZ lJGFGL +LHL 8M/LV[ 5[,L 3F8L JrR[ V[S -MZ 5}I]"P A[p AFH]YL 5yYZ GM DFZM R,FjIMP
B]Gg;[ R0[,F VXST DFGJLGL VWLZTF G[ 5[,F ;XST -MZGF WD5KF0F 56 JF8DFI HIF H]VM tIF\ V[GL V[ H pHF6LVM ! SF/]G[ TM BFTZL Y. occUFDG]\ A;M +6;MI -MZ NG VFYDTFDF\ HF6[ K[ H G. ! VG[ V[G[ YJF ,FuI]\ SIFZ[VF 0]\UZVMDF\YL ACFZ GLS/L HFpP


             The climax is there in the next scene, when he saw that a lady, seating near bush was eating her own child to satisfy her appetite/ Hunger !!!
  56 0]\UZLVM 5}ZL SZL JF8[ R-IF HFI K[ TIF\ 5[,L HF/ GLR[ NxI HMTF SF/]G[ Y. A[9]\PA[ 5F\R 1F6 ;]WLTM G VFU/PVZ[ 4GHZ 56 tIF\YL GCMTL B;TL PPPP56 tIF\ HF6[ T}8[,L SZM0ZHH] RF,] Y.P;;,FGL H[D V[ AFH]GF AF\8\DF\ V,MI Y. UIMP DGG[I DGFJTM CTM oc GF GF 4 V[ TM 0FS6 CTLPPPVZ[ EF.4 A{~ DG[I CT]\ 56 BFTLcTL V[ TM ;;,]\ H CT]\P
Kalu- a protagonist  don’t believe himself what he has seen. He tries to convince himself that what  has seen is not true. How can a mother  eat her own child?? Itmustbearabbit!!Butitwaschild!And if this really happened then we can realize the  downfall of  people.


                                       DL DFZL ;UL VF\B[ VF56F -MZ S5FTF EFjIF G[ V[ S5FI[,F -MZ 5Z vHF6[ VF56[ VlC\ DZ[,F  -MZ 5Z VFJ[ K[PV[JF ;D0F\ UZHF G[ ULW0F HM. <IM! V[ H  O[NF\O[N VG[ V[ H B[\RFB[\R!

                                      TG[ CH] BAZ GYL PPPP UF\DDF\ 3Z0F CMI V[DG[ HM.G[ 5}KL VFJ[ S{I[ SM. NG DFGJLV[ DFGJG[ BFW] CMI V[J]\ ;F\E?I]\ K[PPPPPP VZ[ V[ ;F\E?I]\ CX[ SNFR 456 5}KH[4 S{I[ DG[B 4 G[ T[DFI DF\4 5[8GF H^IFG[ bFFTL CX[P                     

It also mentioned by novelist that women were selling their body only to get food.
       K%5GLIM VFYDTL 5[-LGL ;F\EZ6GL DCF VFOT CTLP V[DF GFGLIF H[JF 5TLV[ 5MTFGL :+LVMG[ KM0L4lNSZFVMG[ DFG[ -F\SJF ,]U0F 56 GF ZCIF4 E,L 4~BL H[JL AF.VMV[ ,FH XZD D]SL 4 G[ DF6; G[ DF+ V[S JF\;GF ZCL v S[D SZL G[ NF6M VGFH D[/JJ]\ v ELB DF\ULG [ 4RMZL SZLG[ 4 VZ[ S]TZF\ GF DM\ DFYL G[ S[ V[9 GL S]\0LVM RF\8LG[I AF.VM V[ TM XZLZ J[RLG[ 5[8GL VFU VM,,JJF DF\0LP DFGJL G]\ VF VW 5TG HM.G[ JFTF" DF\ X\SZNF BZ]\ H SC[ K[ E,L K[ 5ZYDL s5'yJLf S[ ;ZJZG[ C[0JF N[ K[P
                                                   HIFZ[ :+LV[ W6LGL DF\ V[ lNSZL GL lNSZL V[ AF5GL XZD KM0LG[ ;F{V[ SF,[ DZL HX]\ VFHGM lNJ; UD[ T[D SZLG[ SF-L GF\BM4 HLJFI T[8,] HLJM4 EMUJFI T[8,]\ EMUJMP X]\ gIFI  VG[ X]\ VgIFI X]\ GLTL VG[ X]\ VGLTL ?
Chappaniyo draught( of 1900) was the biggest calamity on the  people. The situation was such that women started selling their bodies only to get food. Anyhow, people wanted something to eat- by begging, by doing theft or even sometimes people snatch a piece from dog’s mouth to eat. Such degradation is umimaginable.

5


★Urgetodie......

"NamSibyllanquidemCumisegoipseoculismeis
vidiinampullapendere,illipueridicerent:
Sibylla ti thelesis; respondebat illa: apothanein thelo".

ThisepigraphcomesfromSatyricon,asatirefromPetronius.InEnglishitmeans"I saw with my own eyes the Sibyl at Cumae hanging in a jar/ cage, and when the boys said to her, Sibyl, what do you want? She replied I want to die".It hasmanyinterpretations.oneissheissayingwhatthepeoplewhoinhabitthewastelandaresaying.
(Sibyl:-Granted  eternal  life  by  Apollo,  she  neglected  to  ask  also  for eternal  youth  and  lived  a  life  in  death,  continually  withering but never dying.)(Bloom)

Sibyl looks at the future and proclaims that she only wants to die. The Sibyl's predicament mirrors what Eliot sees as his own. He lives in a culture that has decayed and withered but will not expire, and he is forced to live with reminders of its formerglory.
Similarlypeoplealsowantstodieinthenovel.Thedraughtissoterriblethatpeopleneitherhavefoodnorwater.Becauseofseveredraughtnotevenleavesoftresstoeat.Entirefamilywaslivingbyonlyhandfulofgrains.Allhavesoldanimals,jewelleryamdothermaterialthingsonlytosatisfytheirappetite.Theirlifebecamemiserable.Monsonistooaway,thereisnohopeforhelpfromanybody.Waitingfordeath,becausetheythoughtthatitisbettertodiethantosufferlikethis.
Thus,somewhereurgetodieiscommoninboththetexts.

6

★ Mother image is broken
In every culture very respectable position is given to the  mother. This novel deconstructs the aura of respective mother. No one can imagine worse picture than this that mother eating her own child. ( True test of your character is in the moment of crisis)  InSanskritlanguageitisfamouslysaidthat"JananichaJanmabhumiswargadapigariyasi"meansMotherandMotherlandaregreaterthanheaven.AndinGujaratithereisproverbthat"Maatemaa,bijabadhavagadanavaa"meansnoonecanbecomparedwithmother.Myintentionbehindputtingthislinesistojuxtaposerealismversusidealism.Bookpresentstherealityofcontemporarysociety.atthesametimewecepebrateideals,whicharefarawayfromreality.
★Faith:-
T.S.Eliothasfaithinhumanity.Hebelievedthatregenerationispossible.Thelostsocialordercanbereestablished.Itispossibletomakewastelandagainafertileland.AndhegivessolutionthatbridgebetweenEastandWestisthesolution.Itisappropriatetoquotethe remarks made during the Noble Prize award ceremony in 1948by Gustaf Hellström of the Swedish Academy.
“Humility is also the characteristic which you, Mr. Eliot, have come to regard as man's virtue. ‹The only wisdom we can hope to acquire is the wisdom of humility.› At first it did not appear that this would be the final result of your visions and your acuity of thought.
(The) contact was a shock to you, the expression of which you brought to perfection in The Waste Land, in which the confusion and vulgarity of the civilization became the object of your scathing criticism.
But beneath that criticism there lay profound and painful disillusionment, and out of this disillusionment there grew forth a feeling of sympathy, and out of that sympathy was born a growing urge to rescue from the ruins of the confusion the fragments from which order and stability might be restored.
................. You, Mr. Eliot, are of the opposite opinion. For you the salvation of man lies in the preservation of the cultural tradition, which, in our more mature years, lives with greater vigour within us than does primitiveness, and which we must preserve if chaos is to be avoided.
ThoughEliotiscriticizedasregressive/backwardlooking,hissolutionofcontemporaryproblemisunique.
Pannalalpatelalsospeaksthroughprotagonistthathewillnotloosefaithfromhumanity.Basicallyhumansarenotbad,butsituationmadethemso.Whateverhappenhewillnotleavefaitheitherfromgodorfromhumanity.Howeverworstconditionofsocietyis,revivalispossible.
problemsarecreatedbyhumans.So,itisthepeoplewhohavetotakeresponsibilityofmankindandpreservationofitsculturaltraditionsandvalues.Thesolutionlieswithintheself.
So,itprovesthatboththewritershavegreatfaithinhumanity.
Conclusion:-
My point is that whether West or East, England or India, London or Gujarat “ KAGADA BADHE KALA”. (means "Crows are black everywhere) It is not true to criticize only Western culture. Because somewhere we are also like them, or say basic human nature is common everywhere.


Work Cited:-


Wikipedia contributors."Modern Times (film)." Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, 29 Sep. 2015. Web. 13 Oct. 2015.
Wikipedia contributors."I. A. Richards." Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, 6 Oct. 2015. Web. 13 Oct. 2015.
Frye, Northrop. "The Archetypes of Literature." Frye, Northrop. Fables ofIdentity. NewYork: Harcourt, Beace and World, 1951. 7-20.
Manubhai and Manubhai ( Darshak) Pancholi. "truptino ghunt." Patel, Pannalal. Manavini Bhavai. 11. Sadhana Prakashan, 1962. 9-30.
patel, Pannalal. Manavini Bhavai. Ed. auro books. 11. Vol. first. Ahmedabad: Sadhana Prakashan, 1947.
Patel, Pannalal. Manavini Bhavai. Ahmedabad: Sadhana Prakashan, 1947.
The Modern Times. By Charlie Chaplin. Dir. Charlie Chaplin. Perf. Chaelie Chaplin. 1936.
www.poetryfoundation.org. 13 10 2015. 13 10 2015 <http://www.poetryfoundation.org/poem/176735>.


Harry Potter by J.K. Rowling


 1)
Feminist reading of Harmione’s
character in Harry Potter: How do the character
portrayal of Harmione and other female
characters support feminist discourse?


Lets begin the discussion with the question that why do we need to discuss Feminist discourse time and again?  Lets illustrate it with an example that "Man would be proud to call himself wizard, but will women be proud in calling her witch? definitely not. Because there is something wrong in the structure and language of society. obviously it is patriarchal. we tend to see everything in binaries.Where one automatically comes into dominating power position and Other is labled as "Lack", something that they doesn't have.
And to uncover, unearth this binaries we will require counter discourse which is obviously our point of discussion Feminist reading of Hermione's character.
When we judge any character we've to keep in mind with whom we are comparing? If we compare Hermione with Ophelia(Hemlet) or Hester Prynne (The Scarlet Letter) then definitely Hermione is far better female character. And we can also derive the conclusion that day by day the role and place of female in society as well as in literature also.She is very intelligent girl from childhood and beats boys also in learning magic tricks, which proves her a fast learner.And that's why in Deathly Hallows part Ron says to Harry that without Hermione they cant survive a day or two. Ron says but don't tell this to Hermione.  they admire Hermione's knowledge and strength as a great witch. so it looks very good . But is it so? Is there really no problem with the portrayal of Hermione?


Yes, there is problem. She is used as a OBJECT for the rivalry between Ron and Harry. This OBJECTIFICATION is problematic. Writer could have use something else for rivalry between two friends.
More than that 'Padma' and 'Parvati'- Patil sisters and 'Cho' are also Used as object, nothing else.
another thing is that All the intellectual talk happens between Harry and Dumbledore. why Hermione is not part of that? if she is really intellectual character then why she is absent from the scene? Other charge can be that "How many Horcruxes were really destroyed by Hermione? Unluckily, the answer is not favorable.
Because somehow it is deep rooted in our Psyche that women are always weaker than men.
But perhaps surrounded by Patriarchal structure Rowling can't do that. Some how she is also a subject. Imagine what would have been happen if Hermione will be protagonist, not harry??Then perhaps the series won't be as popular as it is. Only female protagonist will not work for sure. So even Rowling wish she cant do that.
So, after deeply pondering these points one can conclude that Strength of Hermione's character is superficial and surfacial only. If we dig deeper then Hermione fails as a strong character(compare to Harry).

2)      Discourse on the purity of Blood and
Harry Potter: How do the novels play with the
thesis of pure blood (Master Race) giving an
anti-thesis by belonging protagonists to half-
blood / Mud-blood? What sort of synthesis is
sought in this discourse in Harry Potter series?


Concept of purity of blood (race) is very much present in the Harry Potter. Establishing social order by master race is not a new idea. Killing other as inferior race is very prominent in the history.
Now the point is that what is attacked by J.K. Rowling in the Harry Potter? And what she finally wants to establish as a conclusion by the thesis- antithesis on race?

Protagonist- Harry Potter and Hermione Granger are  Mud -blood. Ron Weasley is a pure blood. Draco Malfoy is also pure blood. Where as evil Voldemort is Mud Blood but craving for pure blood.
Rowling SUBVERTS the entire narrative by making protagonists who are mud bloods. And important thing is that they are equally or sometimes more powerful in magic than Pure blood. so, definitely it leads us to think that what should be criteria to judge the people - Race/ blood or merit?.


At the same time we have to keep in mind that Rowling is not despising Pure blood. Voldemort is evil and he is also mud blood. if writer make Voldemort as a pure blood, then definitely it is problematic.Witches and wizards consider themselves superior than non-magic people or non-human species like elves and giants. This act again shows racism working within the magical world. 


It is a satire on Voldemort kind of people that idea of superior race is dangerous/ harmful.  recent History has proved us that how dangerous it is.

many times reference comes in the novel they how pure blood were insulting mud bloods as inferior. And if we hear this kind of dialogue even today in and around us, then we've to be double careful.




5)      The discourse of Power and Politics in
Harry Potter: How does Ministry of Magic
control the resistance? How do they prosecute
the ‘Other’?


It will be interesting if we bring in Michel Foucault's view regarding Power, knowledge and Politics.According to Foucault Knowledge is created by those who are in power position about Other. For Foucault, power and knowledge are created by discourse. Truth, morality and meaning reside within discourse,
Where is the politics in the novel? The answer is that ministry of magic is  the law making body in the wizarding world. The information about Hogward or magical world is kept secret from the non magical people. It is also controlled that one should not strictly do magic in front of muggles outside the Hogward. and if one does then they are punished. This control and punishment itself are the sufficient example of power and politics in Hogward.


Lets quote Foucalt's views abut power......


In his “History of Sexuality” Foucault approaches the concept of power in this manner:


“ power is everywhere, not because it embraces everything but because it comes from everywhere. And power insofar is repetitious, inert and self-reproducing…power is not an institution, not a structure; neither is it a certain strength we are endowed with it; it is the name of a complex strategical situation in a particular society.”   

   
We can also apply Althusser's concept of ISA- ideological State Apparatus, Where Ministry of Magic functioning as a ISA.  they defy rules to gain knowledge. At the same Other (Students) those who are not in power position they are constantly under SURVEILLANCE. There are always two - one who Sees and other are being seen.(The kind of  phobia of constantly seen by somebody CCTV as shown in 1984 by George Orwell is also present here)  but one is trapped in this ideology. of one wants to get real/ true knowledge then they've to break the rules.

 
The specific function of a school means that essentially a power structure. Starting from the headmaster, professors, students and finally servants- Hogwarts presents a HIERARCHICAL POWER STRUCTURES  Students are split up in houses and each house has a common room that is accessed through a secret password. In order to navigate the school the students must be aware of the rules, the signs and symbols that regulate life. Harry Potter manages to defy these rules by gaining knowledge of the castle’s secret passages from the maradaurer’s map.

Interpretation challenge of play Breath by Samuel Beckett.

Dear friends, 
this blog is written as a task while studying Waiting for Godot, by Samuel Beckett at Department of English. This is my comment under the blog of Dr. Dilip Barad. For further reading and interesting video you can visit blog of Barad sir, http://dilipbarad.blogspot.in/2014/09/interpretation-challenge-breath.html


Interpretation challenge of play Breath by Samuel Beckett.
I would like to use quote for play Breath, which is used for Waiting for Godot is that "Nothing happens. Nobody comes, nobody goes, its awful. there is not a single character in the play. No story, no plot. Neither begining nor end.

 In these videos there is nothing except darkness, or garbage or absurd sound. The play is rather symbolic. Human life is meaningless and full of absurdity. The video of modern interpretation shows people walking like machine. People have no time, they have become more mechanical. Or say people are running, but what is meaning of their life. Camera also moves on photo of children, then every thing is empty. Later on chair is empty- symbolizes death.
Other video focuses on medical waste, symbolizes nothingness, meaninglessness.  Camera also focuses on symbol  “Swastik” symbolize Hitler- and we can connect with death of so many people. Massacre done by Hitler is signified. Human existence is futile. 
Even Breath- title suggests Absurdity. We breath to live, but even Breathing is absurd. Similarly human life is also like this. Essence of the play is feeling of uncertainty. Sound, garbage, waste  means nothing. It reflects the mentality of people.  Effect of war is clearly seen on the people. It presents despair and disillusionment of post world war generation.

The Swamp Dwellers by Wole Soyinka.

  • The Swamp Dwellers is a play by Nobel prize winner writer Wole Soyinka.
  • The play is very short, but it opens up deeper layers for discourse.
  • The Swamp Dwellers is a close study of pattern of life in the isolated hamlets of the African countryside as well as an existential study of the simple folk who face rigors of life without any hope or succor. the play is a necessity for a balance between the old and new. Soyinka is not for excessive glorification of past. In the play we can see Soyinka's crusade against authoritarianism, complacency and self delusion.
  • The play expresses a kind of angst, showing the wrong effect of colonialism, imperialism, globalization etc.
  • Before interpreting the play it is necessary to know the time and place of book of written. For example  text of 16th century will be quite different than 21st century text. 
  • The Swamp Dwellers was written nearly at the end of colonialism. it was published in 1958, a year after Ghana's independence and few year before Nigeria's anticipated freedom.
  • So, rather than just presenting or criticizing other, it focuses more on where should we move as a society and Nation.
  • Makuri and Alu are husband and wife. Their two sons Awuchike and Igwezu went to city to make money. Igwezu returns in village all alone, without his wife. Because his wife Desala left him and she chooses Awuchike, Igwezu's brother only because of money.
  • The play is very serious debate on the concept of tradition and modernity. 
  • In the play village stands for tradition, at the same time city is for modernization. older people think city as a breeding place of immorality, corruption and rottenness. Alu & Makuri's son went into city and they changed, so parent's hate for city becomes stronger. Priest Kadiye also comes because he thought that Igwezu came from city, so he might have money. The swamp dwellers have mixed feeling about city. for many people city is the place of comfort, money and luxury.
  • The concept of Modernization is connected with colonialism, imperialism and industrialization.
  • The play mirrors the socio cultural pattern, the pang and the suffering of the swamp dwellers and underlines the need for absorbing new ideas.